SUSTAINABILITY
REPORT 2017
10. Appendices
Appendices

Appendix 1. GRI content index1 102-55 102-56




GRI standard Number of indicator Page Excluded information/comments UN sustainable development goal

GRI 101: Foundation (2016)

GRI 102: General Disclosures (2016) Organisational Profile
102-1 10
102-2 10, 53
102-3 148
102-4 11, 54
102-5 40
102-6 54
102-7 8 Consolidated financial statements for the year 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/reports-and-results/#2017
102-8 8, 67  8
102-9 49
102-10 11, 40 Consolidated financial statements for the year 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/reports-and-results/#2017
102-11 84,00
102-12 19,00
102-13 19
Strategy
102-14 4
102-15 37
Ethics and integrity
102-16 22 16
102-17 102 Business Ethics Code https://www.nornickel.ru/files/ru/corporate_documents/policies/kodeks-delovoj-ehtiki.pd
Governance
102-18 31, 34
102-19 32
102-20 31, 34
102-21 32 http://csr2016.nornik.ru/management/#corporate-governance G4-37
102-22 Annual Report 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/ reports-and-results/#2017 5, 16
102-23 Annual Report 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/ reports-and-results/#2017 16
102-24 Sustainability Report 2017 https://www.nornickel.com/sustainability/reporting/2017, page 36 5, 16
102-25 32 Annual Report 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/ reports-and-results/#2017 16
102-26 30,00
102-27 32 4
102-28 32 Annual Report 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/ reports-and-results/#2017
102-29 32,00 16
102-30 37,00
102-31 32,00
102-32 Front page overleaf
102-33 32
102-34 32
102-35 32, 33
102-36 32, 33
102-37 33 16
102-38 Not disclosed for personal data protection reasons
102-39
Not disclosed for personal data protection reasons
102-40 40
102-41 42 8
102-42 40, 43
102-43 40, 47
102-44 43, 103 
Reporting practice
102-45 Consolidated financial statements 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/reports-and-results/#2017
102-46 47, 128, 130 As regards GRI compliance, the Company fully met the requirements of GRI 101
102-47 130
102-48 Front page overleaf The most significant formal change from 2016 is that Nornickel’s assets located in the Trans-Baikal Territory are now accounted for separately from the Company’s other operations.
102-49 Front page overleaf None
102-50 Front page overleaf
102-51 June 2017
102-52 Annual
102-53 148
102-54 Front page overleaf
102-55 122
102-56 122, 142, 146
Economic performance
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 GRI 201: Economic Performance (2016)
103-2 26, 38 1, 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 201: Economic Performance (2016) 201-1 39,00 2, 5, 7, 8, 9
201-2 Risks posed by climate change are not measured financially 13
201-3 75
201-4 The Group did not receive significant government grants for the 12 months ended 31 December 2017
Market presence
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 102 1, 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 202: Market Presence (2016) 202-1 73 1, 5, 8
202-2 70 8
Indirect economic impacts
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 102, 106  1, 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 43, 140
GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts (2016) 203-1 107,00
203-2 106,00
Anti-corruption practices
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 100, 102 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 205: Anti-corruption (2016) 205-1 102 16
205-2 102 16
205-3 None 16
Energy
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 85, 97 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 303: Energy (2016) 302-1 97, 136
302-2 Reporting not required by law 7, 8, 12, 13
302-3 97 7, 8, 12, 13
302-4 Annual Report 2017 https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/ reports-and-results/#2017 7, 8, 12, 13
302-5 Not applicable to the Company’s products 7, 8, 12, 13
Water
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 85, 90, 102 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 303: Water (2016) 303-1 132 6
303-2 132 6
303-3 134 6, 8, 12
Biodiversity
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 85, 93, 102 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 304: Biodiversity (2016) 304-1 94 6, 14, 15
304-2 94 6, 14, 15
304-3 94 6, 14, 15
304-4 95 6, 14, 15
MM1 94 3, 12, 14, 15
MM2 There are no such sites 6, 14, 15
Emissions
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 85, 102 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 305: Emissions (2016) 305-1 90 3, 12, 13, 14, 15
305-2 Reporting not required by law 3, 12, 13, 14, 15
305-3 3, 12, 13, 14, 15
305-4 90 13, 14, 15
305-5 Calculation not required by law 13, 14, 15
305-6 90 Negligible emissions 3, 12, 13
305-7 89, 134 3, 12, 13, 14, 15
Effluents and waste
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 85, 92, 102 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 306: Effluents and waste (2016) 306-1 91, 134 3, 6, 12, 14
306-2 92, 134 3, 6, 12
306-3 None 3, 6, 12, 14, 15
306-4 There is no such waste or waste transportation 3, 12
306-5 132 6, 15
Environmental Compliance
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 40, 85, 102 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 307: Environmental Compliance (2016) 307-1 40, 85  16
Supplier environmental assessment
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 52,00 16
103-3 36, 140
Employment
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 42, 67, 102, 117  16
103-3 36, 42, 67, 117 
GRI 401: Employment (2016) 401-1 67 5, 8
401-2 137 8
401-3 No data on the number of employees that took parental leave, number and share of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended, by gender, and retention rates due to the lack of centralised records 5, 8
Occupational health and safety
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 42, 67, 79, 102  16
103-3 36, 42, 67, 140 
GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety (2016) 403-1 80 8
403-2 82 No breakdown of injury rates by gender due to the lack of centralised records 3,8
403-3 83 3, 8
403-4 8
Training and education
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 42, 67, 70, 102  16
103-3 36, 42, 67, 117, 140 
GRI 404: Training and Education (2016) 404-1 70 No breakdown by gender due to the lack of centralised records 4, 5, 8
404-2 70 8
404-3 36 5, 8
Freedom of association and collective bargaining
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 42, 67, 102  5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 42, 67, 140 
GRI 407: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining (2016) 407-1 None 8
Indigenous rights
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 62, 102 1, 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2016) 411-1 None 2
MM5 The Group does not have any formal arrangements with indigenous northern minorities 1, 2
Local communities
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 102, 106 1, 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 413: Local Communities (2016) 413-1 Such programmes are implemented in 4 out of 77 (5.2%) Group entities operating in Russia (the Company’s Head Office, Kola MMC, Polar Division, and Nornickel – Shared Services Centre) within the report boundaries
413-2 85 1, 2
MM6 63 None 1, 2
MM7 No disputes 1, 2
Supplier social assessment
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 52,00 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
Public policy
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 43 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 415: Public Policy (2016) 415-1 None 16
Socioeconomic compliance
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 40 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
GRI 419: Socioeconomic Compliance (2016) 419-1 40 16
Emergency preparedness
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 26, 83 16
103-3 36, 140
MM3 92 3, 6, 12
Closure Planning
GRI 103: Management Approach 2016 103-1 128, 130 See also the interactive version of this report, Appendix 2
103-2 106,00 1, 5, 8, 16
103-3 36, 140
MM10 The IFRS financial statements reflect a decommissioning provision for Polar Division, Kola MMC, GRK Bystrinskoye, North Chrome Company, Pechengastroy, Taimyrgaz, and Norilsk Nickel Harjavalta (9% of the Group’s operations within the report boundaries). As at 31 December 2017, this provision stood at RUB 24,336 m.

 

1 The extended GRI content index incuded in the Report’s interactive version gives details on the disclosure of RSPP Reference Performance Indicators and aspects specified in ISO 26000:2010 and GOST R ISO 26000-2012.

 

Appendix 2. Scope of data collection1 102-46 103-1

GRI topics MMC Norilsk Nickel’s Head Office Foreign assets2 Exploration Production Research and development Support functions Other business units of the Group Fuel and energy Transport and logistics
Economic performance 3
Market presence4 
Indirect economic impacts
Energy5 
Water
Biodiversity
Emissions
Effluents and waste
Environmental compliance
Supplier environmental assessment
Employment6 
Occupational health and safety
Training and education7 
Freedom of association and collective bargaining
Indigenous rights
Local communities
Anti-corruption
Assessment of suppliers and contractors by social criteria
Socioeconomic compliance
Closure planning
Emergency preparedness

 

  Information is collected on all companies of the business block
  information is collected on key companies of the business block
The detailed table including the names of the Group companies and branches can be found in the interactive version of this report.
1 The scope of data collection is set in such a way as to describe all of the Group’s material impacts. The scope has not undergone any significant changes compared to the previous reporting period. The Report provides results for all the companies within the scope against each aspect.
2 For the purposes of this report, foreign assets means Norilsk Nickel Harjavalta.
3 As regards pension plans, the boundaries include only the Group’s business units benefiting from the Co-Funded Pension Plan.
4 As regards nationality, the boundaries include all business units of the Group.
5 As regards energy conservation, the boundaries include Polar Division, Kola MMC and NTEK.
6 As regards benefits offered to employees, the boundaries include only Polar Division and Kola MMC.
7 As regards staff assessment, the boundaries include only the Head Office, Polar Division, Kola MMC and Pechengastroy.

 

Appendix 3. Map of material GRI topics (aspects)1

 

1. Economic performance

2. Market presence

3. Indirect economic impacts

4. Anti-corruption

5. Energy

6. Water

7. Biodiversity

8. Sulphur dioxide and solid emissions

9. Greenhouse emissions

10. Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS)

11. Emissions of other substances

12. Discharges

13. Effluents and wastes

14. Supplier environmental assessment

15. Environmental compliance

16. Employment

17. Occupational health and safety

18. Training and education

19. Freedom of association and collective bargaining

20. Human rights: Indigenous rights

21. Local communities

22. Supplier social assessment

23. Public policy

24. Socioeconomic compliance

25. Emergency preparedness

26. Closure planning

 

1 In order to upgrade the map of material topics (aspects), the Company annual polling of external and internal stakeholders, mass media profiling, stakeholder dialogues, and interviews with top executives.
2 Topics 8–11 are in line with the GRI standard Emissions.
3 Topics 12–13 are in line with the GRI standard Effluents and Waste.
4 Topic 20 is in line with the GRI standard Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Appendix 4. GRI Indicators
Environmental Performance Indicatorsи

Environmental Performance Indicators

Branches and subsidiaries Indicator, mcm Group’s total Including:
Polar Division and Norilskenergo NTEK Kola MMC
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total water withdrawal, incl. 352.78 351.96 348.52 328.5 335.64 86.48 95.02 102.49 96.41 100.14 277.43 274.00 267.87 249.93 251.99 35.92 30.16 27.93 35.53 31.73
from surface water bodies 267.33 258.93 254.92 230.45 233.46 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 250.44 242.84 239.21 216.68 220.42 13.76 13.04 12.84 12.39 11.60
from underground sources 27.02 31.16 28.66 33.24 31.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.99 31.16 28.66 33.24 31.57 0 0 0 0 0.30
wastewater from third parties 15.22 21.07 21.15 15.42 20.67 9.77 15.38 15.48 9.78 15.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.04
natural water inflow 33.71 31.84 34.84 40.82 40.59 21.07 23.57 28.60 26.15 29.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.59 8.22 6.19 14.63 11.11
municipal water supplies and other water utilities (excluding NTEK) 9.51 8.96 8.94 8.51 9.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.33 8.77 8.79 8.40 8.68
from NTEK1 94.01 94.08 96.44 98.99 93.58 55.62 56.05 58.39 60.46 55.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

 

1 Included in NTEK’s water withdrawal

 

Water sources 303-2 306-5

Branches and subsidiaries Scale of impact associated with the Group companies’ water withdrawals Scale of impact associated with the Group companies’ water discharges
Polar Division of MMC Norilsk Nickel Withdrawals from water systems (the Yenisei River, water bodies of the Norilo-Pyasinskaya water system and Kara Sea) do not affect the environment and cannot change the ability of the ecosystem to perform its functions Water bodies of the Yenisei River and Norilo-Pyasinskaya water system are used to discharge wastewater
Polar Transportation Branch of MMC Norilsk Nickel
Krasnoyarsk Transportation Branch of MMC Norilsk Nickel
Norilsknickelremont
Polar Construction Company
Norilsk Support Complex
Norilskgeologiya
Taimyr Fuel Company
Taimyrgaz
Yenisey River Shipping Company
Norilsk Airport
NTEK
Norilskpromtransport
Norilsk Trading and Production Association
Murmansk Transport Division of MMC Norilsk Nickel Withdrawals do not affect the water sources (water bodies of the Barents Sea basin) Wastewater is discharged into the water bodies of the Barents Sea basin
Kola MMC

 

Percentage and total volume of water recycled and reused 303-3

Percentage and total volume of water recycled and reused
Indicator, mcm
Group’s total Including:
Polar Division NTEK Kola MMC
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total amount of water used 1,347.96 1,417.80 1,421.41 1,463.81 1,342.07 564.32 567.04 574.17 533.67 512.32 569.59 634.12 634.9 719.02 620.74 172.18 175.38 171.32 170.52 169.64
utility water 27.28 25.02 21.29 20.72 18.53 12.47 11.41 12.51 12.09 11.81 7.11 6.96 2.34 1.79 1.00 2.45 1.93 1.79 1.9 1.79
production, Including: 1,320.69 1,392.75 1,400.12 1,443.09 1,323.54 551.84 555.63 561.66 521.58 500.51 562.47 627.15 632.56 717.24 619.74 169.72 173.45 169.53 168.62 167.85
water reused 39.37 39.41 40.13 36.73 32.64 37.39 37.38 37.7 34.43 30.49 0.88 0.93 0.89 1.03 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00
water recycled 1,202.54 1,269.55 1,275.62 1,219.70 1,105.40 471.30 473.59 478.07 442.82 426.18 458.17 525.9 537.68 607.85 503.43 150.44 150.48 146.67 150.72 157.47
Percentage of reused and recycled water in the volume of water used, % 92.2 92.3 92.6 85.8 84.8 90.1 90.1 89.8 89.4 89.1 80.6 83.1 84.8 84.7 81.3 87.4 85.8 85.6 88.5 92.8

 

The Group’s total volume of reused and recycled water vs. its water withdrawal is 339.1%. This percentage is the largest for Polar Division (456.0%) and Kola MMC (496.28%), and stands at 200.21% for NTEK.

 

Total wastewater and pollutant discharge 306-1

Branches and subsidiaries
Indicator, mcm or kt
Group’s total Including:
Polar Division NTEK Kola MMC
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total wastewater discharge, mcm: 146.17 145.62 140.45 143.55 147.55 33.09 36.20 39.52 38.67 45.29 84.57 80.31 73.55 77.77  78.16 24.47 25.44 23.48 22.59 22.27
insufficiently treated 30.09 30.8 29.71 29.81 27.8 5.81 5.94 6.01 6.42 6.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.06 24.60 23.48 22.59 22.25
contaminated untreated 26.09 26.4 27.73 26.94 33.52 25.22 25.43 27.54 26.83 33.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.02
treated to standard quality at treatment facilities 2.37 4.4 5.92 5.26 7.0 2.05 4.13 5.18 4.71 4.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
standard clean (without treatment) 87.62 84.0 77.10 81.54 79.26 0.01 0.70 0.1 0.73 0.66 84.57 80.31 73.55 77.77 78.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pollutants discharged as part of the wastewater, kt 139.43 140.52 153.1 192.99 216.63 76.93 67.47 76.92 71.83 73.0 0.1 0.27 0.48 1 0.392 61.80 72.68 75.62 119.32 142.925

 

1 The volume of water discharge is measured instrumentally by certified gauges and also based on the Calculation of Water Consumption and Water Discharge and other indirect indicators as approved by the territorial office of the Federal Water Resources Agency.

 

NOX, SO2, and other significant air emissions, including their type and weight2 305-7

Total amount
Branches and subsidiaries
Indicator, kt
Total amount Including:
NOx SO2 Solids
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Group’s total 2,097.09  2,088.33 2,063.52 1,936.44 1,846.80 12.13  11.53 9.84 10.12 11.5 2,032.85  1,947.58 2,009.11 1,877.97 1,785.01 20.63  23.10 20.67 14.3 14.0
Polar Division 1,912.03  1,828.09 1,883.24 1,787.57 1,705.0 1.57  1.61 1.64 1.52 1.6 1,881.06  1,797.18 1,853.92 1,758.18 1,675.9 9.98  9.68 8.95 6.18 6.1
Polar Division  10.54  9.74 6.33 8.2 11.51  8.78  8.11 6.32 6.89 7.88  0.062  0.044 0.008 0.006 0.003  0.005  0.007 0.006 0.006 0.004
Kola MMC 164.62  165.44 169.79 132.9 121.9  1.15  1.12 1.18 1.12 1.2  151.58  150.20 155.05 119.72 109.1 9.98  11.76 10.61 7.38 6.9

 

2 Air pollutant emissions are determined on the basis of the Environmental Monitoring and Industrial Control data: emissions are calculated as per the applicable methodologies using data on feedstock and equipment running time, through sampling and analysing flue gases, direct measurements with gas analysers, etc.

 

Total weight of waste by type and disposal method, mt 306-2

Branches and subsidiaries
Indicator
Waste management
Waste generation Waste generation3 Waste use at own facilities Waste treatment at own facilities3 Waste transfer to third parties (for use or treatment) Waste transfer to third parties (for storage) Waste storage at own waste disposal sites
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total, mt: 40.49 35.17 33.64 33.27 31.93 0.04 0.03 19.35 18.24 18.81 20.15 20.76 0.003 0.0005 0.037 0.044 0.041 0.09 0.09 0.041 0.04 0.049 0.11 0.11 21.08 16.81 14.75 13.54 12.67
Polar Division 26.39 23.07 22.27 22.57 23.26 0.03 0.03 12.96 12.13 13.22 15.18 17.75 0.0001 0.0001 0.026 0.027 0.024 0.03 0.04 0.041 0.04 0.049 0.07 0.07 13.38 10.84 8.99 7.88 7.08
Kola MMC 14.10 12.10 11.37 10.61 8.61 0.00 0.00 6.39 6.11 5.59 4.97 3.01 0.0002 0.0003 0.011 0.017 0.017 0.01 0.02 0.0002 0.0000 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 7.7 5.97 5.76 5.66 5.59

 

3 Has been calculated since 2016.

 

Waste management in 2017 by hazard class and waste type, t

Indicator Waste generation Waste input from third parties Waste use at own facilities Waste treatment at own facilities Waste transfer to third parties (for use or treatment) Waste transfer to third parties (for storage) Waste storage at own waste disposal sites
Hazard class 1 59.926 0 0 0 58.804 0 0
Hazard class 2 2,441.37 15.876 2,401.15 28.36 24.938 0 0
Hazard class 3 12,696.73 1,629.96 10,986.57 316.748 2,685.70 8.111 0
Hazard class 4 1,189,921.72 12,147.69 6,620.55 115.356 7,463.05 56,456.38 1,093,140.20
incl. mining waste and tailings 1,065,001.00 0 0 0 0 0 1,065,001.00
Hazard class 5 30,721,756.19 19,948.42 20,738 693.26 58.837 59,917.68 49,876.85 11,432,552.56
incl. mining waste and tailings 26,454,720.31 0 15,106,726.65 0 0 0 11,347,993.56
Total 31,926,475.928 33,741.94 20,758,701.53 519,301 70,150.17 106,341.34 12,525,693.55
incl. hazard class 1–4 waste (% of the total) 3.775

 

Norilsk Nickel Group’s power consumption in 2017 302-1

Indicator Total Including
power heat in water and steam
Fuel consumption, TJ 176,437.96
(1) including  
Polar Division 24,185.79
NTEK 107,493.12
Kola MMC 9,794.10
(2) including  
coal 1,460.05
natural gas 134,709.43
diesel fuel and fuel oil 35,090.39
gasoline and aviation fuel 5,178.09
Energy production and purchase 142,921.63 66,092.46 76,829.16
Energy from non-renewable sources (TPS) 68,400.69 15,755.03 52,645.66
Energy from renewable sources (HPP) 12,413.55 12,175.35 238.20
Energy sourced from third parties 10,482.68 10,215.40 267.28
including
NTEK 0.00 0.00 0.00
Kola MMC 165.34 4.62 160.72
Energy sourced internally 51,624.70 27,946.68 23,678.03
Energy consumption, loss and sale 142,945.60 66,069.30 76,876.30
Energy consumption 61,963.17 32,354.56 29,608.61
including
Polar Division 35,936.13 16,109.35 19,826.77
NTEK 6,489.47 4,314.19 2,175.28
Kola MMC 12,528.38 9,370.87 3,157.51
Energy sold to third parties 19,502.78 3,607.55 15,895.23
Energy sold internally 52,802.53 28,189.93 24,612.60
including
NTEK 16,138.33 3,107.31 13,031.02
Kola MMC 2,741.21 0.00 2,741.21
Energy loss 8,677.11 1,917.25 6,759.86
The Group's total energy consumption 178,653.58

 

Appendix 5. List of abbreviations

AML/CTF Anti-money laundering / counter-terrorism financing
CDW Corporate data warehouse
CHPP Combined heat and power plant
CIMS Corporate Integrated Quality and Environmental Management System
CIS The Commonwealth of Independent States
CRMF Corporate Risk Management Framework
CSR Corporate social responsibility
EBITDA Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMERCOM The Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defence, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters 
EMS Environmental Management System
ESG Environmental, Social and Governance Criteria 
EU European Union
FIFR Fatal Injury Frequency Rate
FISU International University Sports Federation
FZ Federal law
GOK Mining and processing plant
GOST State standard
GRI Global Reporting Initiative
GRK Exploration company
Group  Norilsk Nickel Group 
HPP Hydropower plant
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards
IISRC International Information Security Research Consortium
IISRC International Information Security Research Consortium
IPA International Platinum Group Metals Association 
ISO International Organisation for Standardisation
IT Information technology
IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature
JSC Joint-stock company
Kola MMC Kola MMC, JSC
KPI Key performance indicators
KPID Kola Peninsula Industrial District
LTIFR Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate
MGIMO Moscow State Institute of International Relations
MMC Mining and metallurgical company
NID Norilsk Industrial District
NTEC Norilsk-Taimyr Energy Company
OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
OHS Occupational health and safety
OHSAS Occupational Health and Safety Assessment System
OJSC Open joint-stock company
PJSC Public joint-stock company
R&D Research and development
RSPP Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs
SDG Sustainable Development Goal
TJ terajoule
TU Specifications
UN The United Nations
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNICRI United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute 
VAT Value added tax
VHI Voluntary health insurance

Appendix 6.
Glossary

Safe working conditions means working conditions where occupational exposure to harmful and/or hazardous production factors is prevented or controlled within the set limits.

Charitable activities means the Company's voluntary transfer of property, including cash, free works and services, and other support, to legal entities or individuals free of charge or on preferential terms.

Stakeholder engagement means the Company's activities aimed at identifying stakeholders’ expectations and concerns and their engagement in decision-making process.

Senior executives means President, Vice Presidents, heads of departments in case of the Head Office, and general directors and their deputies in case of entities located in the Norilsk Industrial District and the Kola Peninsula.

Global Reporting Initiative, or the GRI, means an independent organisation developing sustainability reporting guidelines and standards.

Stakeholders means individuals and legal entities or their groups having certain expectations about the Company or affected by its operations, influencing its managerial decisions while being themselves influenced by such decisions. Stakeholders include the Company's shareholders, investors, employees, suppliers, contractors, consumers, trade unions and other public organisations, federal and local authorities, mass media, residents of areas where the Company operates, and others.

HR policy means a set of standards, rules, regulations, concepts and goals determining the Company's HR management practices (personnel planning and record keeping, recruitment, adaptation, training and development, remuneration and incentivisation, performance assessment, social security, etc.) in line with its development strategy.

Compliance means conducting business in compliance with the requirements of government authorities, applicable laws, regulations, guidelines and standards, including corporate policies and procedures, and ethical business practices.

Collective Bargaining Agreement means a legal instrument governing social and labour relationships within a company or a sole trader business and signed by the representatives of employees and the employer.

Corporate culture means a combination of standards, values and beliefs that determine the way the Company addresses the matters of internal integration and external adaptation, guide and motivate daily behaviour of employees, while also transforming under its influence.

Corporate social responsibility, or the CSR means a corporate behaviour philosophy and concept applied by the business community, companies and specific business community representatives to their activities aimed at meeting stakeholder expectations and ensuring sustainable development.

Local communities means population with Russian citizenship.

Mission means a statement of the Company's goals and objectives that distinguish it from its peers.

Young talent means graduates of universities and colleges whose post-graduate experience does not exceed three years.

Incentivisation means tools and methods of boosting staff performance and productivity, motivating an employee or a group of employees to achieve corporate goals.

Sustainability Report (non-financial report) means an accessible, accurate and balanced description of the main aspects of the Company’s activities and achievements pertaining to its values, goals and sustainable development policy, and addressing the matters of most importance for the key stakeholders. This is a way of publicly informing the shareholders, employees, partners and other stakeholders of the Company's progress towards its goals and objectives set out in its mission statement and strategic development plans with respect to financial and environmental stability, and social security.

Health and safety system means an occupational health and safety protection system embracing legal, social, economic, organisational, technical, sanitary, hygienic, healthcare, rehabilitation and other activities.

HR management policy means an end-to-end integrated HR management system including all stages of employee-employer interaction, from recruitment to retirement and post-retirement support.

Environmental protection and resource efficiency means corporate programmes aimed at minimising the Company's environmental impact.

Human Capital Development Programme means a set of priority measures focused on bringing human capital to a new level in line with the Company's strategic goals and objectives.

Occupational disease means a health disorder caused by a systematic and lasting exposure to workplace factors or a combination of production-specific working conditions.

Local community development programmes means corporate social programmes implemented voluntarily and intended to contribute to the development of local communities.

Personnel development means a set of initiatives aimed at employee recruitment, adaptation, retention, and fully unlocking their professional and creative potential.

Risk means a negative impact on achieving the Company’s goals that may be caused by ongoing processes or future events.

Top management means President, Senior Vice Presidents, Vice Presidents, members of the Management Board and heads of departments of MMC Norilsk Nickel; directors of branches of MMC Norilsk Nickel and their deputies; sole executive bodies (directors, general directors) of the Group companies and their deputies.

Certification means confirming compliance of qualitative characteristics with quality standard requirements.

Employee performance management framework means a combination of methods, processes and procedures designed to boost employee performance in line with the Norilsk Nickel Group's corporate strategy. The framework also covers employee performance assessment and competency review.

Social partnership means a framework of relationships among employees (their representatives), employers (their representatives), and federal and local government authorities aimed at reconciling interests of employees and employers on matters pertaining to the regulation of labour relations and other directly associated matters.

Social programmes means voluntary corporate initiatives pertaining to employee development and motivation, creating favourable working conditions, promoting corporate culture and charity, and supporting local communities. These initiatives are implemented on a regular basis in line with the Company’s business strategy and focused on satisfying balanced requests of various stakeholders. From the management perspective, a social programme is a set of initiatives carefully planned in terms of resources, workforce and timeframes, and efficiently addressing the Company’s internal or external social objectives.

Social package means a set of benefits, compensations, additional payments, statutory and additional services provided to employees by the employer on top of their salary.

Standard means a guideline stipulating requirements to the object of activity.

HR management strategy means principles, regulations and approaches to personnel management focused on efficient implementation of the Company's business strategy and providing for unlocking of the employee potential, in order to achieve corporate goals.

Head Office’s business unit means a department, division or other business unit included in the Head Office's organisational structure and/or acting on the basis of the staff list approved by the Senior Vice President for HR, Social Policy and Public Relations.

Significant locations of operation means the Norilsk Industrial District, Krasnoyarsk Territory (except for the NID), Kola Peninsula Industrial District (Murmansk Region), Trans-Baikal Territory, Moscow, and other Russian regions.

Sustainable development means a concept developed by the UN that acknowledges the role of business in ensuring sustainable development of the society; a concept of global community development factoring in the interests of both living and future generations.

Payroll budget means total payroll and social payments.

Appendix 7.
Stakeholder dialogue minutes

Dialogue minutes, Norilsk

Venue: Norilsk, We Are the City! social technologies forum

Date: 31 March 2018

I. Chernova, Chief Manager of the Social Policy Department at MMC Norilsk Nickel, welcomed the participants and told them about the dialogue objectives.

As a company with a history of more than 80 years and a strong social and environmental commitment, Nornickel is making a sizeable contribution to the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. In 2016, it joined the United Nations Global Compact, which marked the transition to a new strategic development cycle running until 2022. The 2017 report will be the Group's first sustainability report presenting the Company's progress on compliance with the UN Global Compact principles. The dialogue is intended to discuss applicability of the UN 2030 Goals indicators and targets as proposed for the review of the participants to Nornickel’s operations. I. Chernova introduced the speakers and gave the floor to M. Vashukova.

M. Vashukova, Executive Director of the Association “National Global Compact Network”, spoke about the role of the UN Global Compact in making businesses more environmentally friendly. Launched in 1999, the UN Global Compact became one of the world’s most notable initiatives aimed at encouraging businesses to implement sustainable development policies on an ongoing basis. By showing a commitment to environmental protection the companies strive to minimise their environmental footprint, while also improving their governance framework, stakeholder engagement processes, technology, training and education systems along with raising the awareness of employees and local communities.

The speaker emphasised the importance of Nornickel's joining the initiative given the scale of its business and international footprint, and praised the Company’s proactive approach to implementing the Global Compact principles.

A. Ermolin, member of Alexei Kudrin's Committee of Civil Initiatives, explained the procedure for the four upcoming panel discussions (Environmental Protection, Human Rights and Protection of Local Communities, Development of Local Communities, and Industrial Policy and Labour Relations). Each panel will be presenting their view on the applicability of targets and indicators for each of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals to the Company's operations. The moderator made a remark on a more complicated nature of the discussion as compared to last year, as the previous discussion was dedicated to high-level goals only. He also wished the participants an exciting and productive dialogue.

The Industrial Policy and Labour Relations panel speaker presented the results of the panel’s discussion. According to the panel, the Company should focus on the goals and targets related to raising employee income, supporting the community's social, economic and political involvement, encouraging orderly, safe and responsible migration and mobility, ensuring decent work and economic growth, fostering education and employment of the young, promoting responsible production and consumption, and making a contribution to combating climate change. The speaker presented arguments underpinning the panel's position and reiterated the applicability of the global goals to both the Company's operations and regional development in general.

The Development of Local Communities panel speaker presented the results of the panel’s discussion. The panel concluded that there was no gender inequality on the Taimyr Peninsular, which makes the respective targets and indicators irrelevant. Qualified medical staff and targeted funding of expensive surgeries are key to the healthcare development. Another important aspect is the development of professional education and expansion of the educational programmes offering to include both sciences and humanities. It is important to keep enhancing the quality of life in the region, develop tourism and preserve unique indigenous traditions.

The Environmental Protection panel speaker presented the results of the panel’s discussion confirming relevance of the goals and most of the environmental targets for the Company, excluding those applicable to small and insular states and more southern regions.

The Human Rights and Protection of Local Communities panel speaker presented the results of the panel’s discussion citing increased agricultural productivity, enhanced transparency, effective and accountable institutions at all levels, targeted anti-corruption efforts, adoption of new reporting standards, and combating inequality by accounting for the specific context of the Northern region in legislation, as the most relevant objectives for the region.

A. Ermolin noted that the discussion served to prove relevance of the global goals and targets for Russia, Taimyr and Norilsk. At the same time, the moderator stressed inapplicability of certain topics as they reflected the realities of developing countries with a weak legal culture. He thanked the participants for their contribution to the identification of global sustainable development goals and objectives that have most relevance for the Company and the region at the moment.

Dialogue minutes, Monchegorsk

Venue: Monchegorsk, We Are the City! social technologies forum

Date: 14 April 2018

I. Chernova, Chief Manager of the Social Policy Department at MMC Norilsk Nickel, welcomed the participants and told them about the dialogue objectives.

As a company with a strong social and environmental commitment Nornickel seeks to comply with the current global agenda for sustainable development leading the charge in Russia in terms of non-financial reporting. Since 2005, the Company has been publishing corporate social responsibility reports to inform the stakeholders of its policies, plans and achievements in such important areas as corporate governance, environment, development of local communities, and others.

In 2016, Nornickel joined the UN Global Compact, which marked the transition to a new strategic development cycle. The 2017 report is the Group's first sustainability report presenting the Company's progress on compliance with the UN Global Compact principles.

As part of its reporting process, the Company traditionally engages in a dialogue with stakeholders. Today's meeting seeks to find out which of the indicators for achieving the UN goals and targets may be used to assess the Company's performance in its regions of operation.

I. Chernova introduced the speakers and gave the floor to V. Skobarev.

V. Skobarev, Head of Corporate Governance and Sustainability at FBK (independent auditor of the Company's 2017 report), highlighted the increasing importance of non-financial drivers in a company's valuation. According to him, these drivers include human and intellectual resources, experience and relations.

The speaker told the audience about the UN Sustainable Development Goals and various stages of sustainability penetration into the policies and operations of the Company.

He stressed that businesses should not view these goals as a binding obligation and use them as a guidance for further development and transformation of their corporate culture, strategy and policies.

A. Ermolin, member of Alexei Kudrin's Committee of Civil Initiatives, greeted the participants and explained the procedure for the four upcoming panel discussions (Environmental Protection, Human Rights and Protection of Local Communities, Development of Local Communities, and Industrial Policy and Labour Relations). As part of those panels, the participants are invited to discuss the applicability of indicators for each of the UN Sustainable Development Goals to Nornickel's operations in the Murmansk Region.

The Environmental Protection panel speaker presented the panel participants and named the preservation and rehabilitation of land and forests, freshwater and marine ecosystems, comprehensive management of aquatic resources, including as part of cooperation between Russia and Finland, and universal access to cheap electricity as the key focus areas for the Company.

The Human Rights and Protection of Local Communities panel speaker presented the panel participants and opined that, for the Murmansk Region and Nornickel, the most relevant goals were those related to decent wages and living standards, and protection of local communities from the effects of climate, economic, social and environmental changes. To that end, the Murmansk Region authorities have set up a dedicated fund. Another target associated with enhancing agricultural productivity and food security (one of the region's key priorities) is to maintain the genetic diversity of seeds and cultivated plants. On top of that, a lot of effort is being put into combating corruption at the federal, regional and corporate levels. The speaker also suggested appointing more women as top managers to fight inequality.

The Development of Local Communities panel speaker presented the panel participants and highlighted the traditionally high importance of healthcare and education issues that need to be addressed to ensure sustainable development of the Company and the region. Nornickel provides opportunities for the continuous vocational and technical training in the Murmansk Region. Motivating young talents to work at the Company's facilities, including Kola MMC, is yet another relevant target.

The Industrial Policy and Labour Relations panel speaker presented the panel participants and the discussion results. The panel views the goals and targets related to industrialisation, innovation and infrastructure development as an integral part of Nornickel's operations. The Company's focus on disruptive technology and innovation is a sign of sticking to the responsible production and consumption principles, the two elements that are indispensable for meeting the region's goal to ensure sustainable use of natural resources.

The Company is the region’s and the nation's flagship in achieving goals and objectives related to decent work and economic growth.

A. Ermolin thanked the participants and noted that the discussions served to demonstrate the universal character of indicators for the UN Sustainability Goals and Targets, as most of them can be used to assess the Company's operations in the Murmansk Region.

I. Chernova also thanked everyone for participating in the dialogue and discussing the topics that are of great importance to Nornickel. She also reiterated the Company's openness to a dialogue, and invited the participants to continue cooperation in the future.

Appendix 8.
Stakeholder recommendations

Recommendations Company response
Survey-based recommendations
From external stakeholders
Include local community opinions on the Company's programmes in the report To be done in the next report
Engagement with non-profit organisations is the focus of attention for the local community. It is therefore important to disclose information showing positive evaluation of this engagement, including awards and recognition of joint projects Done in the form of insertions
Disclose increased environmental protection spending and link it to the produced effects, including reforestation of the areas adjacent to Norilsk Done; see the Biodiversity Conservation section and the environmental news feed
Describe relations with working dynasties and present honoured workers Partially done; see the Employee Awards section
Provide more detail on biodiversity in the Company’s regions of operation based on nature reserve monitoring data Done; see the Biodiversity Conservation section
Disclose responsible consumption matters in a broader context to show responsibility across the production and consumption chains Partially done. The report describes the supply chain management process (from feedstock sourcing to product sales) and touches upon responsible consumption in the segment of precious metals and metal-bearing products; see the Supply Chain Management section
From internal stakeholders
Disclose job creation for disabled employees Done; see the Employees and Social Policy section
Disclose information as per the rating requirements Done. The report discloses additional rating indicators in Corporate Governance and Environmental Protection
Provide a more detailed disclosure on the prevention of occupational diseases and employee rehabilitation Done; see the Occupational Health and Safety section
Disclose information on the production continuity management Done; see the Risk Management Framework section
Participate in developing informational and technical reference books on the best available technologies Done; see the Supply Chain Management section
Disclose the Company's mid-term strategic plan in social and environmental management listing specific initiatives in the pipeline Partially done. The report describes strategic environmental projects; see the Environmental Protection section
Analyse financial results achieved through dedicated social and environmental initiatives Partially done. The report describes the system put in place to assess social programmes and relevant assessment results for 2017; see the Assessment of Social Programmes section
Provide a more detailed disclosure on the Sulphur Project Done; see the Environmental Protection section
Reduce the reporting volume Done
Recommendations made by the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs’ (RSPP) Council on Non-Financial Reporting
Include more sustainability-related economic matters (for example, economic consequences of non-financial risks) in the report Partially done. The report provides information about responsible consumption
Disclose performance assessment of social programmes Done; see the Assessment of Social Programmes section
Conduct ISO 26000 self-assessment Self-assessment is slated for 2018
Add per unit indicators to the gross figures disclosed in the environmental impacts section Done; see the Environmental Protection section
Disclose energy consumption and environmental impact indicators for new major construction projects in the future reports (for example, the Chita project). Partially done. The report breaks down energy consumption by region (for the Norilsk Industrial District, Kola Peninsula and others).
The Report features the Company's targets and plans for a number of important business lines, which is one of its obvious merits. It is recommended that in the next reporting cycles the Group uphold this approach broadening the scope of disclosed topics Done. The report discloses targets for new topics such as respect for human rights and combating corruption
Include information on the electricity output at HPPs and energy sourced from third parties Done; see the GRI Indicators section
Clarify if the Company, despite having a corporate fleet, charters vessels as mentioned in the Impacts from Transport Operations section Done. The relevant section contains the required clarifications
In the next reports, use insertions to disclose and highlight certain aspects and provide a comprehensive overview of significant events or facts from the reporting period Done. The report eliminates fragmented disclosure of one topic in different sections
When it comes to IR disclosures, readers would like to know which social and environmental issues are of interest to investors Done; see the Dialogue with Shareholders and Investors section
Mention the use of the GRI Mining and Metals Sector Supplement in the About the Report section Done
Comment more on changes in indicators, with a particular focus on how they are related Done; see the Economic Efficiency, Employees and Social Policy and Environment sections
Consider holding public hearings on the draft report in the next reporting cycles To be done in the next reports
In the strategy disclosure, add information on the future reference points and specific plans to the development priority details Done; see the environmental news feed and the Corporate Strategy section
In addition to the objectives, disclose specific plans for the mid-term and next reporting period, provide information on their implementation and summarise performance against the goals and objectives for all material aspects Partially done; see the Environment section
Provide more details on the KPI system, making a special emphasis on the sustainable development and corporate social responsibility KPIs To be done in the next reports
Provide more cases to support information about the material aspects of corporate social responsibility activities Done; see the report’s design
It is important to include detailed comments on the indicators, especially in case of material changes Done for material changes
In future reports, provide a more extensive disclosure on the responsibilities across the supply chain and contractor relations, specify how the corporate HSE standards apply to contractors, describe relevant controls, achievements and further plans Done; see the Human Rights and Labour Relations sections
Disclose information on using corporate tools to assess the performance of social programmes for the management purposes Done; see the Assessment of Social Programmes section
Provide more details on how the corporate CSR targets correlate with the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda, describe the Group's contribution to achieving these goals (including solutions to address specific challenges) Done; see the report’s design
Enhance disclosure of economic aspects of the Group’s operations in the report To be done in the next reports
Specify which of the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda are pursued by the Company, provide their description in the overview of strategic goals, objectives and results Partially done; a column added to the Sustainable Development Goals table. Detailed integration will be considered in the next reports
Disclose quantitative indicators for waste management at NTEK Done; see the Environment section
Pay greater attention to the disclosure of the Company’s plans in corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. A new Plans subsection could be included the key performance sections The Company pays close attention to the disclosure of strategic goals and plans across its lines of operation. Introduction of a special subsection to each of the relevant sections will be considered in the next reports
Clarify whether a new strategy was adopted in 2017 or it was only a matter of updating strategic priorities under the Company’s 2013 strategy Done; see the Corporate Strategy section

Appendix 9.
Awards and accolades 103-3

Awards
of MMC Norilsk Nickel

Safety and security

Environment

Society

Awards of other Norilsk Nickel Group companies

NordStar Airlines

Yenisey River Shipping Company

Appendix 10.
Opinion of the RSPP Council on Non-Financial Reporting

Opinion of the RSPP Council on Non-Financial Reporting on the Norilsk Nickel Group’s 2017 Sustainability Report for the purposes of public verification

 

The Council on Non-Financial Reporting of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (the “Council”) established as per the Management Bureau’s Resolution dated 28 June 2007, reviewed, at the request of MMC Norilsk Nickel (the “Company”, the “Group”, “Nornickel”), the Norilsk Nickel Group’s 2017 Sustainability Report (the “Report”).

The Company requested the RSPP to arrange for the public verification of the Report, with the Council on Non-Financial Reporting providing an opinion on the completeness and materiality of the Report’s information about the Company’s operations from the perspective of the Social Charter of the Russian Business. The Charter sets out key principles of responsible business conduct aligned with those of the UN Global Compact, as well as domestic and international CSR standards.

From 26 April to 21 May 2018, the Council members reviewed the content of the Company’s Report and passed this Opinion in accordance with the Council’s Procedure for Public Verification of Corporate Non-Financial Reports.

The Council members possess all the required competencies in corporate responsibility, sustainable development and non-financial reporting, comply with the ethical requirements for independence and impartiality, and provide their personal expert opinion rather than the opinion of organisations they represent.

The Report was assessed based on the following criteria of information completeness and materiality.

Information is considered to be material if it reflects the company’s efforts to implement the principles of responsible business conduct set out in the Social Charter of the Russian Business (see www.rspp.ru).

Completeness implies that the company provides a comprehensive overview of its operations, including the underlying values and strategic benchmarks, governance systems and structures, accomplishments and key results, and the stakeholder relationship framework.

The procedure for the public verification of the Report factors in the Company’s application of international reporting frameworks; this Opinion does not, however, purport to assess the Report’s compliance with such international frameworks.

The Company is responsible for the information and statements provided in the Report. The accuracy of the Report’s information is beyond the scope of the public verification procedure.

This Opinion has been prepared for MMC Norilsk Nickel. The Company may use it for both corporate and stakeholder communication purposes by publishing the original version without any changes.

CONCLUSIONS
Based on the review of the Report and the information publicly available on the Company’s official website, and following a collective discussion of the results of the Report’s independent assessment undertaken by the members of the Council on Non-Financial Reporting, the Council confirms as follows:

The recommendations made by the Council following the public verification of the Norilsk Nickel Group’s 2016 Report were duly noted and incorporated into the 2017 Report. For example, the Company provided a more detailed coverage of the responsibility across the supply chain and contractor interactions.

The Company’s 2016 Report contains material information relating to the following aspects of responsible business conduct.

Economic freedom and responsibility The Report presents the strategic performance of the Norilsk Nickel Group and the Company’s financial and operational results. It discloses the Company’s sustainable development goals and relevant results for 2017, and informs about the completion of major projects to ensure the Company’s economic efficiency, sustainability, and leadership in the global metals and mining industry, supported by specific examples. The Report dwells on the Company’s impact on the domestic economy and regional development, while also featuring information about corporate governance and sustainability management, including the review of non-financial risks and their mitigants.

It also describes the corporate integrated management system, anti-corruption policies and procedures, along with the Company’s compliance with the UN Global Compact principles. A special focus is placed on the corporate culture development programme launched in 2017 to ensure effective implementation of the Company’s strategy.

Business partnerships The Report presents key stakeholders and their interests, interaction mechanisms, and key engagement initiatives in 2017, with the Company’s Business Ethics Code cited as the underlying document that outlines stakeholder engagement principles and procedures. It also informs about target meetings with investors concerning environmental protection, social responsibility and corporate governance (ESG), and features detailed information on HR management practices and policy, the Company’s efforts in ensuring employee health, safety and professional development, and implementing corporate social programmes based on social partnership, collective bargaining agreements and communications, including the employee engagement survey. The Report describes quality assurance measures, procedures to monitor customer satisfaction and compliance with contractual terms, and review complaints. It gives account of the Company’s procurement activities that rely on the principles of openness and transparency, strengthening of competition and procurement automation, feedback channels, prevention of corruption and ensuring compliance with health and safety regulations among suppliers.

A special attention is paid to the Company’s relations with regional and municipal authorities under partnership agreements, interactions with business partners, and support for international and domestic initiatives in the area of sustainable development.

Human rights. The Report declares respect for human rights in line with Russian and international laws and regulations as one of the fundamental principles for Norilsk Nickel’s operations, and gives account of Nornickel’s relevant regulations and procedures. It gives a description of the Corporate Trust Service responsible for collecting and reviewing data on human rights violations, and submitting relevant reports to the Board of Directors’ Audit and Sustainable Development Committee and the Company’s units.

It may be concluded from the Report that the Company does not employ children, minors and women in harmful and/or dangerous working conditions. According to the information contained therein, the Company gives its employees an equal opportunity to exercise their labour rights, prevents any discrimination, and respects the rights of indigenous peoples living in the regions of its operation.

Environmental protection. The Report emphasises the Company’s commitment to reducing emissions, on a phased basis, and sustainable use of natural resources. The Company’s environmental management system that forms part of the integrated quality and environmental management system, is harmonised with production, finance, health and safety management. The Report highlights Nornickel’s environmental management priorities, while also containing information on the revised Environmental Policy approved in 2017 and compliant with ISO 14001:2015. The Company reports numerous internal audits of the environmental management system conducted in 2017 in accordance with international standards and the Company’s by-laws, along with environmental expenses and indicators. It also discloses activities aimed at reducing environmental footprint, progress on energy efficiency improvement, and contribution to fuel and energy development across its geographies. The Report includes details on the Biodiversity Conservation Policy developed in 2017 and cooperation with nature reserves.

Contribution to the development of local communities. The Report outlines key areas of cooperation under the social and economic partnership agreements with the governments and administrations of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Murmansk Region, Trans-Baikal Territory, Tver Region, Saratov Region and the city of Norilsk. It dwells on the Company’s contribution to the development of local communities, and provides details on the key regional social and economic projects. A special focus is placed on the Company’s successful tackling of socially and economically important freight logistics challenges to ensure continuity and sustainability of operations and well-being of local communities. The Report describes the Company’s participation in establishing the Norilsk Development Agency and its commitments as the general partner of the XXIX International Winter Universiade to be hosted in 2019 by Krasnoyarsk, including the backing of the first-ever 2017 International Forum attended by leaders of volunteer movements from over 90 countries.

A detailed information is provided on the We Are the City! social technologies forum and the funds allocated by Company over the year for social programmes in the regions of operation.

Final provisions

Information in the Report generally reflects the Company’s consistent work towards the integration of corporate social responsibility and sustainable development principles into its business practices. The Report contains a significant amount of information about the Company’s impact on the society and environment, its strategy and policies in the key focus areas, and the effect of the related programmes. It covers the main focus areas and formats of stakeholder engagement, including those used in preparing the Report.

The Report was prepared using internationally and domestically recognised reporting tools (e.g. the GRI Standards, Comprehensive option, GRI Sector Disclosures and the RSPP Reference Performance Indicators), which ensures comparability of the Group’s information with that of other Russian and international companies. The Report is also in line with the UN Global Compact and UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Material topics (aspects) and the Report structure were defined based on the contributions from stakeholders.

The 2017 Report is the Company’s fourteenth non-financial report, which demonstrates its determination to consistently develop reporting processes and enhance transparency. The Company uses various forms of independent assessment and confirmation of disclosed information (professional audit and public verification). This reflects the Company’s commitment to keeping stakeholders informed and maintaining the high quality of disclosures.

RECOMMENDATIONS
While acknowledging the Report’s strong points, the Council calls attention to some aspects of disclosures’ materiality and completeness, which should be addressed in the future reporting cycles.

It is recommended that in future reports, the Company disclose more plans for the forthcoming period, including key objectives, and information on their implementation for each reporting period. It is further advised that the Company give more details on how its performance against goals and objectives correlate with the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda given the growing attention to these issues globally.

It would be appropriate to comment more on changes in indicators to clarify the details, and also include relevant references to the annual report, including on economic aspects, as cross-references improve the complementarity of disclosed information. The Report provides coverage on the Company’s sustainable development and corporate social responsibility policies.

It is recommended that future reports contain information on their implementation, given its importance for the stakeholders and assessment of the Company’s business practices.

As a mainstay of local economies, the Company is advised to disclose, during at least three years, the amount of investments in the regions of operation along with their effectiveness and contribution to economic potential, social climate, and development of local communities. It is also recommended that further information on the performance of the Norilsk Development Agency established in cooperation with the Company (employment of local population, strengthening cooperation with local suppliers, development of infrastructure, support to small businesses, etc.) be included in the Report.

Given the Company’s experience of working with suppliers, it is advised that future reports describe the Company’s impact on their business ethics, including corruption prevention, social and environmental responsibility. It would be useful to provide examples of how these aspects are monitored as part of assessing reliability of business partners, and how the latter implement relevant policies and standards into their business practices.

As the 2017 Report contains information on corporate governance, it is recommended that next reports feature resolutions made by the Norilsk Nickel Group’s governance bodies on responsible business practices and sustainable development. It would also be appropriate to dwell on the sustainability efforts of the Board of Directors’ dedicated committee.

Traditionally, the reports prepared by the Norilsk Nickel Group contain information about the public verification procedure at the RSPP Council on Non-Financial Reporting. We advise that future reports additionally disclose information on incorporating the RSPP’s recommendations given in the previous report.

The RSPP Council on Non-Financial Reporting hereby takes a positive view of this Report, supports the Company’s commitment to responsible business practices, notes consistency in developing the reporting process, and confirms that the Norilsk Nickel Group’s 2017 Sustainability Report has passed the public verification procedure.

RSPP Council on Non-Financial Reporting

Appendix 11. Independent Assurance Report1 102-56

 

1 The auditor of the Sustainable Development Report was approved by the Senior Vice President for HR, Social Policy and Public Relations.